-NVC and PHILOSOPHY-
Now, that we have described some of the principles of NVC, let's compare it with True Philosophy.
The intent of NVC is to create connection in conversation by having useful beliefs (the NVC tenets) and sadly the requires turning off discernment, which is more than a red flag. Contrarily, the intent of philosophy is to arrive at objective truth and morality in any given situation, which requires understanding First Principles.
NVC should obviously not be a worldview or philosophy as its fundamental assumptions are false, therefore it should be dispensed with entirely, as once the value is adequately reframed it no longer resembles NVC.
Yet, some may argue that NVC is NOT a worldview and so does not have worldview tenets but in order for NVC to be used the tenets MUST be believed to be true. When you research NVC you will find that there are core assumptions always mentioned as they are necessary to use NVC.
Like structuralism, postmodernism, and NLP, the goal of NVC is to focus on the structure of language instead of the consciousness behind it. This structure is then not a metaphysical one, but a relativistic one based on the fluctuating unexamined psychological needs at any given time. How we communicate, how we act is NOT the subject of PHILOSOPHY because those things are based in context, and every context is as unique as every moment. Gender expression is in constant flux with the Law of Rhythm and Vibration. For example, in terms of doing the Great Work, sometimes it is good to be aggressive in communication with the sacred masculine, and sometimes it is good to be gentle with the sacred feminine. The hard and soft styles of communication both serve a purpose if done in the right context with good intent based on understanding. Sometimes a person needs to be shaken from their delusions as when one is trying to save one from a dangerous cult, and other times gently coached to understand a simple distinction.
The territory always changes and our responses have to be tailored to specific events, conditions, people, and people's psychology. On the other hand, Natural Law Philosophy regards the absolute immutable principles of creation, not a relative description of HOW individuals SHOULD behave with other people since the manifestation of absolute principles in every situation is different. Attempting to create a system of HOW those qualities SHOULD manifest, can only be relativistic, and very imbalanced, especially when it does not include the masculine of critical thinking and logic. While we cannot hold onto an ideology to facilitate social interaction, we can gather truth of any situation when grounded in Objective Truth Itself, Natural Law. Without understanding Natural Law we cannot consistently determine the multitude of truths in reality as we have no ABSOLUTE GROUND. Thus, we will be easily swayed by the whims of culture, ego, and self-interest like the pragmatist.
Now, those in the Trivium camp who advocate NVC are certainly not suggesting to use it as an ideology, but as a tool. And this may be possible in an extremely narrow context, and to repeat from earlier to reframe NVC so drastically requires that it be called something else. If one desires to connect with someone there are many ways to do that, but coming from the heart with greater empathy and compassion has its own authentic language and expression that cannot be linguistically constructed.
NVC cannot be a tool or methodology for identifying and communicating feelings and needs, as that is the work of self-awareness. While methodologies are good in the linear progression of thought, in terms of awareness they actually filter perception. This was a point made by Jiddu Krishnamurti and also Roy Masters, who considered formless meditation to be an effective tool of self-awareness as the absence of methodology or dogma.
Simply, there is no formula for self-awareness.
Unfortunately, Krishnamurti could not articulate Natural Law as he didn't quite go all the way, yet in some sense you can consider that he understands Natural Law in a feminine way, intuitively. Consequently, he is often taken out of context, like Rosenberg does here. At the 25:32 mark, Rosenberg says, "according to the philosopher Krishnamurti to observe without evaluation is the highest form of intelligence." Download Freedom From the Known.
This is a misinterpretation as Krishnamurti was not about rejecting evaluation and discernment, but about rejecting the bias and prejudice that evaluation and discernment can foster when it becomes part of an inaccurate worldview. I talk more about this in my Philosophy and Love videos .
When not used as a tool for self-awareness but as a tool in expression, like communication and rhetoric, methodologies definitely have their place, and obviously with developing the mind like the Trivium. But we must never be stuck to one methodology, as we learn to integrate many skills as CONTEXT changes moment to moment. Getting stuck to an ideology, methodology, or tool causes one to see the world as mechanical and static, rather than organic and dynamic. NVC shouldn't be THE method of communication, as there should be various methods of communication. A different tool is used in a different context, as dogmatic thinking occurs when we proscribe one methodology to ALL CONTEXTS. Dogma is against philosophy, as philosophy regards what can be applied to all contexts, the UNIVERSALS themselves.
When it comes to becoming a more compassionate and caring person, this cannot be generated by learning skills and techniques, but by working on consciousness, as these are the qualities of consciousness. Skills and techniques are still useful, but ONLY when used by a consciousness that has developed virtuous qualities. Compassion cannot be engineered with language but cultivated with development. As Plato and Aristotle understood, one should never make a human system from virtues and characteristics, as this is not the realm of strict logic. Once we think that a tool or methodology can create a QUALITY then it is artificially created, and this is usually done with a social agenda, to get what we want in a social context.
In exploring the roots of NVC, we have to examine a network ideas.
While some have examined the connections of people between nefarious ideologies and associations to socialist-globalist think-tanks to reveal conspiracy, it is more likely that many of the proponents of false ideologies are not conscious of what they are part of and believe they are doing good. Rather than dissect who's part of the conspiracy, it is much more wise to deconstruct the ideologies that support the conspiracy of the control system with reason alone.
At the end of the 19th century, was Friedrich Nietzsche and existentialism. “GOD IS DEAD,” or more accurately “metaphysics IS dead,” would be the post-Enlightenment anthem in which philosophy descended into solipsism, ultra-subjectivity, and moral relativism. (But in truth metaphysics can never be dead, it is WHAT IS regardless of human perception.) Nietzsche's perspectivism would become the basis for postmodernism as his book Beyond Good and Evil would say that ”the world is not made of facts but interpretations.” Every perspective would be seen as equally true. Later, Martin Heidegger's existentialism turned metaphysics upside down as well, so that philosophy was no longer the search for objective truth and knowledge of being as in the days of antiquity, but creating the meaning of being through creative exploration and arbitration. Philosophy became poetry. While we should not seek to oppose philosophy and creativity, existentialism conflated the two giving the dangerous impression that truth is created.
After the existential crisis over the death of philosophy in which philosophers gave up on metaphysics came pragmatism as now philosophy was narrowed to the practicality of ideas. Truth became “whatever works for me,” and that which contained “cash value” (referencing Williams James) and this would become the basis for the new age and self-help businesses.
Another postmodern ideological predecessor was structuralism, which would act as a metaphysical-proxy since man's search for the structure of reality cannot be eradicated, only corrupted. Rather than seeing Origin, Nature, and Objective Reality as the structure of reality, CULTURE would become the structure and its cultural narratives.
Ferdinand de Saussure
Above image from the Book The Trivium, DOWNLOAD
In the early to the mid 19th century, modern linguistics sought to overthrow our classical understanding of language with the Trivium subjects grammar, logic, and rhetoric for overly-abstract theories that challenged metaphysical realism and that language could actually correspond to reality. Structuralist Ferdinand de Saussure would see that meaning only exists in the relationship and differences between words to other words. This would corrupt the Aristotelian Categories of Substance and Attribute in General Grammar, and the Absolute in Natural Law. Postmodern linguistics contradicts the fact that substances EXIST and have ESSENCES not only independent of their attributes, like Kant's transcendental self but independent of their connection to other things. Modern linguistics would directly attack the existence of SELF as an immutable substance, which carries an obvious socialist/collectivist agenda, as we shall see and destroys the basis for true spirituality.
Later, the post-structuralists, the French postmodernists would even suggest the dangerous idea that the “self” is a creation or by-product of a network of ideas, a rehashing of the David Hume's empiricism, who saw self as a byproduct of a bundle of sensations. Hume also desired to destroy metaphysics, reducing all things to relations. Without metaphysics, language becomes the collective products of social interaction rather than reflecting any independently existing reality.
No Identity, Relations
Ludwig Wittgenstein studied philosophy of language and while he began the task of creating a mathematical formula for language with the logical positivists, he ultimately gave up on logic and became a pragmatist saying that “most of the time the meaning of a word is its use.” He also brought forth the concept of “language games,” which maintained that language does not correspond to reality and that concepts do not need clarity for meaning, as all meaning is context-dependent.
I just want to make the point that I am not saying that some truths are not context-dependent, but that even so, they have correspondence with the Absolute, which is not context-dependent, in order to be true at all.
Essentially this would lead to the idea that language creates reality, and we must analyze this carefully as it is a dangerous half-truth. Here Bill Joslin discusses this problem. He states around the 2:00 mark, “there is an idea floating around in academia that linguistics is primary to consciousness. To take the idea that reality begins with linguistics which in turn dictates the structure of society which then affects the consciousness of the individual which creates an individual's reality is this concept of the stolen concept....I've heard people say that if you don't have a word for it then it doesn't exist and that's not true. If there is a tree you may not have any language but you won't run into it. This idea of taking higher-order concepts and placing it as an axiom is a mis-integration of information. ”
Joslin suspects and intuits that the premise language creates reality is false, which he can only deconstruct by saying that this ideology claims that there are no first principles when that is itself a first principle, thus stolen concept. But as we saw earlier, because he fails to understand the law of mind he still believes that language constructs higher-order concepts, which even though built on the lower language closer to objective reality reflects no objective reality in and of itself.
This is still modern linguistics.
To see how modern linguistics is still going strong here is a 2017 clip of a woman who insinuates that language creates reality due to the differences in different languages. And here we make the point that the Trivium is about general grammar, not about specific grammar, as the same objective reality exists no matter your language. I just want to interject that this woman is confusing two questions, one is whether language shapes the way we think and the other is whether language creates reality. Now, obviously, language shapes the way we think, which is why we want to study language so that our thoughts can be in conformity with reality. But the answer to the second question is no, except that our thoughts influence our actions which then create things in objective reality.
She goes on to say: “The diversity of linguistic diversity...reveals how ingenious the human mind is... human minds have not invented one cognitive universe but 7,000. There are 7,000 languages around the world. And we can create more. Languages are living things for us to hon and change to suit our needs.
I play the full clip in 1984, where a person talking to Winston says, “The destruction of words is a beautiful thing...” he goes on to say, “have you have seen the dictionary? the 10th edition? it's this big, and the 11th edition will be this big.” He gestures how the size becomes smaller, and then Winston responds, “the revolution will be complete when the language is perfected.”
See a connection with NVC basing everything on NEEDS?
Around the 30:00 mark, Rosenberg says “by 4:30 this afternoon you will never hear another insult, there will be no such thing as criticism.”
Remember this feminist campaign to actually ban a word?
Interestingly Tragedy and Hope makes this error of modern linguistics as there is a differentiation between words and the things they refer too.
What people are getting confused with here, and this applies to general semantics, is that the nature of language, which is to express reality, thoughts, feelings, and actions has both matter and form, two components. Matter is the system of symbols created by convention, which is why different languages have different words for the same things. And form is the meaning, which deals with metaphysics as absolutes, substances not created by culture.
Once we think that words are the building blocks for reality then we are lost in relativism as words can be created and destroyed. But in actuality, the things that the words refer too cannot be created nor destroyed with thought and communication itself. What is IS.
The reason why language can correspond to reality is because reality is even more multi-dimensional than the dimensions that language can describe, therefore higher-order concepts CAN reflect the mental aspect of the cosmos.
Okay, here is objective reality and then language which describes reality, as it is a main use of language to describe actual things, whether concrete or abstract. If done accurately there is a correspondence between reality and language. What contributes to no accuracy is not understanding language, logic, and metaphysics in which they rest, also corrupting language which these ideological institutions that we have been speaking of does also corrupt our understanding of reality. This can take the form of not understanding definitions, etymology, the meaning behind words, and their logical relationships. Because actions are driven by the mind, then with corrupted language which presents a corrupted worldview, our actions will not be in alignment with objective reality thus we create false realities through our actions. This is how language creates reality, in a sense, but it does not create objective reality. Our misalignment to objective reality causes negative consequences due to moral causality, which is a principle of objective reality.
The General Semantics of Alfred Korzybski attempted to be a science of change in communication systems, delineating principles involved in tracking a constantly changing territory. He took a non-Aristotelian stance on systems challenging the basic notion that a thing is what it is, the law of identity, the law of contradiction, challenging the law of the excluded middle, and the law of polarity, saying that change is the only constant. He was not holistic and could not see that static identities and essences exist in the midst of change, like the Self, the one immutable constant. Also, L.Ron Hubbard who created Scientology used general semantics in his book Dianetics.
It should be no surprise that the Institute of General Semantics has its ties with the United Nations.
click image to download
Check out the New York Center for Nonviolent Communication (NYCNVC) having 27,000 registered members and an active participating population of over 5,000 in 100 countries, which definitely requires political funding. Thom Bond the founder, was a disciple for Rosenberg for 15 years, and here it states that this group, the NYNVC, is a United Nations Civil Society Organization).
At the 3:15 of the U.N. Deception Documentary it discusses how globalist cloak their goal with less threatening labels like world order, collective security, inter-dependence, global community, economic integration, and convergence, but all point down the same road. Yet, candid admissions occur like in their report in 1961 called “A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations,” which states, “it is world government we are discussing here-inescapable.” The clip ends with George Bush senior calling for a New World Order.
Gregory Bateson was also into general semantics which became systems theory and cybernetics, as we will get to. Clip from Gnostic Media starting at 5:54 mark talks about NVC and its ties to Gregory Bateson, cybernetics, and the CIA.
I wanted to see a recent event on the topic of general semantics and found this from the New York Society for General Semantics. Nora Bateson, Gregory Bateson's daughter, reveals the dangerous implications of this ideology and its attack on the SELF and promotion of collectivist values. We can see how these ideas have led to postmodernism.
I play the clip starting at 15:30 min mark, where she reads her poetry that considers the “I” of grammar to be violence, claiming the “inter-dependence is the law,” also saying, “grammar needs to evolve,” into her twisted linguistic destruction.
What it comes down to is that general semantics is a postmodern subjectivized intellectualized proxy of the subject of general grammar.
General semantics would become the basis for later complexity/chaos theory and systems theory, with the idea of prioritizing the interrelations of things over individual substances. The pioneer of systems theory is Erwin Laszlo, President of the Club of Budapest, member of the Club of Rome, advisor to UNESCO. These organizations that Laszlo is part of the desire to create a single global interconnected technocracy over man, and therefore systems theory is the academic presentation of systems engineering, which relates to social engineering and “organizational psychology” which overlays the political agenda for control. This is about controlling the dynamics of interaction by focusing on the structure of interaction. We can consider education, government, and the media to be systems of control. Related is cybernetics.
Systems theory tends to see that individual behavior is the result of its inter-dependency with outside systems, concerned with the external dynamics of evolution rather than the inward dynamics of the individual. This, in turn, promotes the co-dependency between man and the authoritative social institutions that enslave him. The truth is that each individual and his own change is NOT context-dependent, as each man has the ability to rise above his social conditioning which postmodernism will tell you is not possible. The goal of man is to become INDEPENDENT, AUTONOMOUS, and SOVEREIGN, not to merge with the cage of a social system. The system sciences obfuscate self-knowledge to give the social sphere dominance when the individual is merely a part in the system of manipulation. We see this with the new cage Gaia and web-of-live beliefs and with evolutionary theory and its concept of "inter-dependent emergence." While it is a spiritual truth that everything is interconnected, we must see how the darkside uses this truth for its own ends.
Cybernetics Control System via Technology
Recommended watch: Bilderberg and the Digital
New World Order
Now, this actually relates to the Progressive Education by John Dewey in which children were seen as the products of their environment, so the focus was placed in the environment rather than teaching the individual important abstract concepts with language and arithmetic. Yet, learning the Trivium is incredibly important to structure our minds properly. Because children are not taught the Trivium in school they do not learn how to speak in conformity with their thoughts or think in conformity with reality, only to regurgitate the dictates of social authority and conform to their environment by reflecting its values.
The ideological basis for learning theory was “constructivism” in which its first principle is:
We can see how this relates to structuralism.
Now those in the Trivium group have discussed the dark use of the Trivium which can be seen in modern education in the process of indoctrination as the evil agenda is to disrupt the information man has available to him, as well as disrupt information processing by teaching him WHAT to think not HOW and this is why man becomes prey to belief-system, as government itself is a belief-system. Man with no knowledge and no logic is controlled man, and the chaotic output of his behavior due to inner disorder brings upon the natural consequence of external proxy-order in the form of government.
Real ORDER comes from WITHIN the INDIVIDUAL, but systems theory has turned everything inside out, so that the center of man becomes a single global authority.
In psychology, constructivism was also promoted by Jean Piaget, in which he expresses the anti-metaphysical statement: “there exists no structure without a construction.” This ignores that humans can actually receive information and knowledge about themselves and the environment that is not constructed but reflective. While there is much that humans construct due to human creativity, humans SHOULD not be constructing facts...
Also in psychology, psychiatrist Milton Erickson used language to create hypnosis called the indirect technique, which is the use of vagueness, ambiguity, and confusion in conversation to create suggestibility, receptivity, and a mild trace. We can clearly see how Milton's vague language has become the style of postmodern rhetoric, which keep the college students in a trance-like hypnosis in which they can never make direct meaning of anything. This would become part of NLP. Ultimately, the purpose of education is to CONFUSE not educate.
Constructivist Jean Piaget
Download Milton Erickson's Complete Works
Obfuscation: Deliberate confusion
This is a great documentary by truthstreammedia that discusses MKULTRA.
The field of psychology is directly tied with the US government and the CIA, in terms of psychological warfare, which was established by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in Great Britain, which unified with America. Governments wanted to know how to create behaviors in people through the mind, to have power over them, and make them better slaves. This is how they maintain the power differential. Understanding people's psychology is knowing how to control and manipulate them, and the government has a big stake in controlling the mass mind of the population.
From 1984, after Winston is discovered to be a rebel having a love affair with a women, he must go through painful electroshock therapy to make “him sane,” which means to torture Winston until he submits to the ruling party.
MK-ULTRA doctor Ewen Cameron, who served the OSS, the precursor for the CIA, performed mind-control experiments under the field of psychiatry. He was the director for Canadian Psychiatric Association and the American Psychiatric Association and president of the World Psychiatric Association. He is but one out of many.
Psychiatrist Brock Chisholm, president of the World Health Organization in 1957 said, that the reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong are that belated objectives of nearly all psychotherapy. This is a complete reversal of meaning as most of our mental health issues are actually based in moral relativism. We will soon see how humanistic psychology of Carl Rogers would be exactly what Chisholm desired.
In 1966 Rosenberg was awarded diplomat status in clinical psychology from the American Board of Examiners in Professional Psychology.
This board comes from the American Psychological Association founded in 1892 by eugenicist and social darwinist Stanely G. Hall. Members include William James, John Dewey, Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers, and Edward Thorndike. Rosenberg says that we should never reward people with our language, but here he is being awarded from an elite institute, a trained dog of the dark occultists.
Here is an article about the American Psychological Association working with the Department of Defense during Bush's administration. on what they call “interrogation techniques” which is really just instructions of how to torture people at Guantanamo Bay. The prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay were there for being terrorists without going through the courts and a trial, as terrorists under Bush's definitions which includes anarchist and anyone against the violence of the state. The infamous quote from George Bush after 911: "you are either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."
911 was an INSIDE JOB!
Government is Terrorism!
In psychology, we have humanistic psychology of Carl Rogers, who was Rosenberg's mentor and a pioneer of the Human Potential Movement. Rogers claimed that “experience was the highest authority," another relativistic belief. He came up with client-centered therapy, much different than psychoanalysis, under the belief that the “client knows best” and would, therefore, directs the entire therapeutic process as the therapist would merely listen and offer empathy and positive reinforcement. The focus is on creating an environment of validation, and later this would become part of the extreme social validation given in new age cults.
Thus, humanistic psychology in many ways combined the new age and business with psychology, a direct assault to true psychology. In the humanistic context, as humanism places man at the center of all things, psychology became about getting your ego stroked, and pursuing narcissistic fulfillment and success rather than actually resolving psychological issues (ignore the negative).
At the 30:00 mark (above video), a woman reports that her father makes insulting remarks and Rosenberg tells her that “she killed his poor jackal” with HER harsh judgments (about her father), and that with this new technology, as he puts on giraffe ears, that she won't be able to hear criticism, that insulting remarks won't exist.
This makes a profitable business model. Therapy became nothing more than getting paid to be someone's best friend and most agreeable friend at that. Client-centered therapy would fuel the culture of narcissism, with the following tenets that would become part of the new age.
- No one can KNOW anything more than anyone else. (No, there are degrees of knowledge and consciousness.)
Only a person can know themselves and that no one can know another person. (Not true, another person can know what is going on with another person by observing their behaviors through the course of time. If that person has more self-knowledge than the other person he can understand that person more than that person. When we go to a psychologist it should be because we are seeking to understand our psychology in which the psychologist understands more.)
No one is ever wrong as all experience is truth (moral relativism).
This is a full attack on the subject of knowledge. People are no longer seeking self-knowledge or truth but hearing what they want to hear. Psychologists and psychiatrists would effectively feed into people's delusions as this all feeds into the delusion of the control system. The real role of psychologists should be giving insight to the client that the client cannot see himself, pointing out blind spots, shadow, contradictions, wrong behaviors, false beliefs as the true method of self-development is APOPHASIS. A psychologist SHOULD have more self-knowledge than the client, otherwise, we have the blind leading the blind!
Client-centered therapy sought to eradicate the hierarchical relationship between client and psychiatrist, like the postmodernists who desired to eradicate the hierarchical relationship between opposites, seeing the statement that rationality is better than irrationality as oppressive. And this resonates with the feminist doctrine. Riane Eisler, systems theorist and Club of Rome member, saw that culture infected man with the power-dynamic of masculine against feminine, oppressor against oppressive. She introduced the term “domination culture” to describe a system of top-down ranking ultimately back by fear and violence of man over man, man over woman, race over race, religion over religion, and man over nature. We can see how this directly influenced NVC.
Her observations are only partially correct as this tends to place blame on the pathological masculine when the pathological feminine is just as responsible. If women would stop supporting their sons, brothers, and husbands going to war, they wouldn't. There would be no wars if there were no order-followers and those people WHO submit to false authority with cowardice. To negate the principle of self-defense of the sacred masculine is just as bad as violence as it encourages violence to oneself. Imagine if every Jew in Nazi Germany owned firearms so that when government came to take them away they wouldn't be able to without a fight. What if the Jews knew they had the right to defend themselves from government, the key word here is KNEW, what if they KNEW, KNOWLEDGE is required. The idea that culture victimizes man, the tenet of NVC, is a half-truth as man victimizes himself by not gaining the knowledge of objective morality as to defend himself.
While we recognize the importance of criticizing top-down authority of the control system, it is only effective when there is bottom-up ignorance. When people conform because they lack the knowledge that all such authority is an illusion and that "might makes right" should never be our moral imperative. Eisler didn't criticize the order-following of the military as it is the military that performs the actions given from the top-down.
The CYCLE OF VIOLENCE
Feminism would lead to creating a victim-complex for the ego. (I refer to this above clip of Jordan Peterson starting at the 4:20 mark where he discusses how victimhood can create violence.)
Back to Riane Eisler, who doesn't see how the pathological feminine also supports the control system. She would desire is to create lateral “partnerships” between all the elite globalist organizations under feminism, to help create the inter-relations of the Control System. Pathological masculine and pathological feminine work hand in hand. Here (bellow) it shows the underlying agenda of NVC to create government and corporate structures.
The DARK FEMININE
Riane Eisler Quote: “Schools in which parents and teachers relate as partners—where Nonviolent Communication is part of every interaction—are communities of learning, rather than top-down, impersonal factories.” But note that there is NO LEARNING with NVC, its all about validation.
Social theorists and cultural marxists of the Frankfurt school which folded into postmodern academia also focused on the dominator culture and the victim-perpetrator dynamic. Like Eisler, they saw first hand the devastating effects of evil in tyrannical regimes having to flee from Nazi Germany to come to America where the Frankfurt School became the Institute for Social Research. Critical theory would perceive the master-slave imprint as a cultural structure, failing to see it is the premise of GOVERNMENT and the control system as a whole.
Their proponents would only see the trees but no forest. In this way, critical theory and cultural marxism would be an intellectual trap for those seeking to understand the nature of collective evil and tyranny. After such horrifying events of the 20th century, you would think a moral relativist could be easily proven wrong.
But sadly, these ideologies that attempted to resolve collective evil would be still based in relativism as they would associate truth and knowledge as a belief, dogma, narrative, and claim that brings dominance! But in reality dogma and truth are opposed.
Here is the rise of minority rights, feminism, and multiculturalism. This would divert people's attention from real oppression getting people to quarrel more with themselves and become polarized to divide and conquer. In the West, we live today in a climate of misandry under the banner of feminism. And this would extend to the hatred of all things masculine, including logic and discernment.
What they this really means:
Ultimately, these ideologies feed into the communist-socialist agendas by seeking to enlarge government to handle social injustices many which would be frivolous in order to end human oppression, which is an oxymoron, given that government is by nature a structure of oppression.
Now we are going to discuss the Human Potential Movement which began from Roger's humanistic psychology, Erickson's hypnosis, and also Abraham Maslow's theories of self-actualization, development, and peak experiences. He presented the hierarchy of “needs,” and this idea that all human motivation is based on needs would be a tenet of NVC. I am also going to discuss Werner Erhard's EST training which became Landmark Forum, which is based in transformational models that seek to actualize one's potential. I have personal experience with that aspect of the Human Potential movement and find it to be way more interesting than NVC, although still troublesome. While NVC is about connecting with others and Landmark is about maximizing possibility and opportunity in each moment, they both make up the masculine and feminine aspects of this movement, which is why it is good to examine both to see the whole of the movement, so later I will have a brief analysis of Landmark.
Maslow's hierarchy of needs left out the need for knowledge and truth, prioritizing survival and security needs. It is no wonder that this is exactly what the government promises to humanity, to take care of us by providing us with our lower needs which don't require anything higher like goodness, truth, and love. We could rationalize abuse of parents on children as long as they take care of them physically. Also, by putting needs in a hierarchy so that one need is required before the other need is erroneous and rationalizes the lower needs over the higher ones.
Also, from the humanistic movement was the concept of the ideal self that would merely support the persona and ego, the desire for a social image of achievement, financial status, and value according to the dominator-hierarchy. Notice in this model (on the left) that there is no objective reality.
Read more about the UN's 2030 Agenda
The Human Potential Movement is also connected to the civil rights movement and the new age movement. While the civil rights movements desired equality for all, it became co-opted with socialist agendas as well. Like postmodernism, it fell into false egalitarianism of the pathological feminine. Hierarchical values, judgment, and discernment and natural inequalities in development, consciousness, or ability, were perceived as oppressive and negative. Yes, excellence become oppressive, and so did KNOWLEDGE become oppressive.
Socialist Party from 1984
Today the civil rights activists are the social justice warriors of the postmodern religion, not only a mockery of the civil rights era, which at least had some good in it but as the end result of the uncorrected errors of the 60s counterculture revolution. Any movement based in relativism has no good direction and only gets worse.
Social Justice Warriors today
Marshall Rosenberg was a civil rights activist during the civil rights movement in the 1960s and while the movement was correct in advocating the equality of rights between races and gender it would lead to poisoned political activism. When the solution to human rights requires understanding what a right is, objective morality, and that the initiation of violence is wrong, instead this movement was controlled opposition that sought to end violence by destroying the existence of moral polarity. Ironically, a moral relativist can never define what true violence is.
At the 0:55 mark, Deepak Chopra (Club of Rome member) is quoted: “What is the nature of good and evil? God is the union of all opposites. Evil no longer exists.” from his book How to Know God. Here (below) Chopra praises NVC.
Like the civil rights movement, the new age movement would seek social change, but through an ideological route, attempting to revive occult and esoteric knowledge. In a way, the New Age attempted to fulfill the place of Natural Law but through distortion and misteaching of spirituality. This is why some in the Trivium camp mistakenly see Natural Law in a new age sense. Teal Swan at the 3:37 mark claims that the “new age movement is not in the business of feeding your beliefs but in the business of teaching you how to question your beliefs and then choose the beliefs that serve you.” This is pragmatism.
Here John Coleman talks about the Club of Rome
As a proxy, the new age would propagate dangerous half-truths and positive beliefs to feed cult-communities and self-help business. Yet, nothing opposes the Truth more than business and egoic resonance. The goal of the new age was to make humanity one big happy family of hyper-positivity as to eliminate any “alienating” judgment from group practices. EVERYONE IS AMAZING.
With these movements, we have the birth of Esalen and the California Institute of Integral Studies that would promote educational workshops on the psychological new age, Eastern mysticism, and systems theory during the hippie movement.
Esalen and NVC (to the right). Click catalog to see what
Esalen is recently doing.
Click image to read 1967 Esalen Article from Psychology Today.
Here the Tavistock Clinic is mentioned which overlaps the early history of the Tavistock Institute, with the goal of developing psychological warfare. When the clinic became the National Health Services the institute was formed to carry out research that the NHS would not be able to. The Tavistock Institute's main funder was the Rockefeller Foundation. The goal was to destroy humanity for a global takeover through the systems of control.
is mentioned here.
Rockefeller says (at the 4:35 mark): “our window of opportunity in which a truly peaceful and INTERDEPENDENT world order might be built will not be open for too long. Already there are powerful forces at word that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts of an enduring structure of global cooperation." Hmmm... are his enemies people who are waking up to the knowledge of true sovereignty? Does he want his global system of domination to get 'em while they are asleep?
This woman with 25 years of business leadership which correlates to the masculine side of the human potential movement has certifications from the Tavistock Institute, NVC and NLP. Original Website.
This woman holding an AWARE parenting conference a few months ago has graduated from the Tavistock Institute and has completed the Foundation course on NVC. Original Website.
Doctors involved with MK-ULTRA have been listed at Esalen, like Ewen Cameron, whom we talked about. Another is Lauretta Bender who performed LSD experiments on hospitalized disturbed children. Her earlier work was electroshock therapy on children, which actually made them worse. https://archive.is/DJ1x (her connections)
To read more about other connections between Esalen and MK-ULTRA go to https://steemit.com/pizzagate/@whitedeer9217/esalen-cia-doctors-and-mkultra
A main part of Human Potential Movement was NLP, an attempt to integrate the many aspects of postmodernism and psychology, especially the Milton-Model of hypnosis and modern linguistics. The goal was to create behavioral changes through language, a subtle method of control.
This included implanting suggestions in a person's mind, using unconscious signals, and getting them to come to certain conclusions on their own. It was also about maximizing your rewards from the control system through hyper-adaptability. This is no real evolution... The irony is that NLP was being used while it was being taught so that you would get sold on their product while learning how to sell.
NLP would be used by Anthony Robbins in his famous infomercials, and in the Advertisement Industry at large with the rise of the personal coach industry to act as a substitute for self-mastery that would often lead to parasitic relationships And in the 2000s NLP would merge with pick-up artistry in how to get dates. Using language to control and manipulate people is certainly a form of mind-control, which the salesman would rather have you forget. In the era of NLP, language would become a pragmatic tool for getting what you want without any moral considerations.
At the 2:20 mark (video on right) this NLP person says that on some level we are always manipulating people to get what we want and we have been doing this since we were kids, that we have to influence people to survive, but as long as we aren't hurting anyone it is okay. Later at the 3:50 mark he relates NLP to a chess game, which reveals a connection between NLP and game theory... .As a quick side note, pragmatists and game theorists don't find anything wrong with playing the game to win and think that if everyone is aware that we are playing a game that no harm can be done. But from a spiritual worldview playing from the ego does create harm because you are basing the purpose and meaning of life on selfishness and materialistic agendas from the false self rather than real evolution and the objective good in which everyone wins.
Cultist communities would become not only the business model of the new age but a social experiment for government mind-control. And not just mind control, but emotional control that would illicit certain positive emotional states as a form of manipulation.
Here (around the 1:30 mark) Mark Passio talks about how people focus more on the delivery than substance of communication. For example, the attractive newscaster on the nightly new who will whisper sweet nothings in your ear all night and say 2+2=5, but the person who is telling you the truth whom you might not like the harshness of his voice may be saying, hey—you are in danger, you are actively in danger.
In this scene from 1984, the authoritarian from the State Party is re-conditioning Winston to believe that 2+2=5 with electroshock torture. I put this video clip to reveal that if we don't accept truth as a species then we will continue in the path towards a totalitarian state of physical dominance, where we will be forced to believe in nonsense. The “controller” says, “Do remember in your diary stating that freedom is the ability to say that 2+2=4, and Winston replies yes, and the authoritarian asks, “how many fingers am I holding,” as he holds four, and Winston responds, “four” and then the controller says, if the party says there are five then how many are there?” And Winston begins to say, “four..” but then he trembles and quickly changes it to five to not get electroshocked, but the controller knows he is lying and then shocks him some more, trying to fully break him.
In this independent film clip (above), a class in a super authoritarian society is teaching that 2+2=5. One child challenges this and refuses to accept the lie. The teacher gets very frustrated with him and gives him one last test for obedience, to write 2+2=5 on the chalkboard and the kid writes 4, instead of 5. He is instantly murdered and his blood splatters on the chalkboard. While it seems we went off on a little tangent regarding physical control rather than emotional control, its all connected, as you use emotional-mind control to get people to give up their right to self-defense as with gun control and then you can use physical violence to get people to do whatever you want, in which people get killed or endlessly tortured for KNOWING the truth as in this story.
Telling people what they want to hear and getting them to feel good keeps people in a hypnotic regressed state to foster co-dependence and collective narcissism. Cults are a mini control system that restrains individual thought, exploration, and expression, suppressing critical thinking as subordinate to groups needs, in which individuals are more likely to conform and obey. It is the prioritization of the hive mind over the identity so that the collective identity takes precedence.
Individuals susceptible to this have unresolved trauma, broken families, and were victims of bad parenting, in which they attempt to treat a deep psychological wound with the wrong method and ideology, as new age psychology only supports egoic desires and not the real healing of the true self.
Cults act as a healing-proxy, to bind one to their trauma to use as social leverage and to exploit vulnerability. This is in addition to being a metaphysical proxy and familial proxy. They seek to imitate the father through false ideology and mother through community, which provide social cohesion and uniformity.
When Marshall Rosenberg uses puppets to display the overly-simplistic worldview of NVC with the giraffe and jackal, this appears to be a form of manipulation to relax people's defenses and invoke the inner child and placate familial needs.
The community attempts to mimic the undifferentiated state of mother-child so that there is no division. With collectivist thought of the pathological feminine one feels fused to another, seeing the other as an extension of themselves in which there is no true self-ownership. This is how chameleon-like nature and following cult leaders has arisen from new age collectivism.
The tenets of the cult's ideology as a form of mind-control and dogma represent the father archetype, the collective identity, community concepts, and emotional control, all attempts to represent the mother archetype. Since we have talked more about the former let's go into the latter.
Combined with pragmatism this becomes super-adaptability, being whatever works best in that particular moment, the optimization of self-interest. In such a case, one has no true center. Today we see the social justice warriors doing this with gender fluidity and flexible identities.
We can see why it is imperative for cults to resolve any conflict that might disrupt such a safe space, as cult leaders would pervert our need for safety. The millennial social justice warriors also yearn for the ultimate safe space of the mother's womb in their inability to handle criticism. This is why they want to enforce laws and destroy free speech so that no one's feelings can ever be hurt with words and that everyone is “safe.” In the pathological feminine, the lack of discernment is conflated with bliss and ignorance with peace.
While the surrogate mother of the community attempts to mimic unconditional love, it is very conditional to your acceptance of the cult's ideology, as challenge to the doctrine is prohibited leading to censorship and taboo topics. This toxic environment makes it difficult for people to interact with others outside of NVC, revealing its cult-like nature.
We see this consensus type thinking at the new world order think tanks, in which everyone seems to be on board with all the plans of the global elite as the lack of dissenting voices seem artificial, which it is.
Because this is a system that uses punishment and rewards. those who adhere to the consensus paradigm have successful careers and those who don't, since the money game is a big part of the control system.
The empiricists' destruction of the notion of archetypes and postmodernists destruction of the notion of gender, prevent people from gaining self-knowledge and healing their parental issues. Healing from these issues involves differentiating from the corrupted mother/father archetype that was imprinted on us, by identifying it, understanding why your parents are that way, and then forgiving them. And it's important to understand here that you can forgive them even if they don't apologize or ask for forgiveness. The next step is gaining the knowledge of the corrected archetype so that it is grounded in the Absolute (Natural), and then recognizing your connection to the archetype through correspondence to SELF, this is the understanding part of knowledge. Finally comes action that is in alignment with the archetypes in their appropriate expression.
While any type of control system and cult will externalize archetypes to plug you into their matrix, freedom and evolution require that we internalize the archetypes and develop the aspects of consciousness within ourselves in the alchemical journey. It is this inward journey that all propaganda is attempting to prevent.
By acting as a surrogate family, cults seek to keep adults in a childish state as the more childish people are and behave, the more they desire, so-called “need,” and create government, as external anarchy and the state of freedom, can only exist for cosmic adults with moral accountability.
Mini-cults merely correspond to the larger CULT of the control system and global government, which also requires social cohesion and group identification. Thus the feminine is just as responsible for evil as the masculine. The dark occultists do not want us to understand what self-defense and the rights of the individual immersing us in egalitarian collectivism so that we do not protect ourselves by exercising the sacred masculine.
The CULT of GOVERNMENT also acts like the surrogate parent, with daddy capitalism and the ideology of pragmatic moral relativism, along with mommy socialism, under HUMANISM-the cult of humanity to be directed and controlled by human authority.
We could boil down the world's problems to the existence of CULTS, the cults of the control system as a whole, the cult of religion, including the cult of the dark priest class, the cult, the cult of money, the cult of politics, and cult of new age communities like NVC.
The solution to human slavery: QUIT YOU CULT TODAY.
And now for Part 3!!!